Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs PHI Seeds Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs PHI Seeds Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Omnibus 271(1)(c) Notice Without Specific Charge Held Invalid- ITAT Delhi Quashes ₹20.33 Cr Penalty for Defective Notice; Concealment vs. Inaccurate Particulars: ITAT Voids Penalty for Lack of Specificity in Notice Delhi ITAT dismissed Revenue’s appeals & upheld CIT(A)’s order deleting penalty of ₹20.33 crore imposed for A.Ys. 2008-09 & 2009-10, holding that the penalty notices issued u/s 271(1)(c) were invalid as they failed to specify whether the charge was for “concealment of income” or “furnishing inaccurate particulars.” In ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930