Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jarul Glasswork Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jarul Glasswork Private Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The issue before the Tribunal is levy Penalty of ₹10,000 levied u/s 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1). Assessee argued that he had complied with notices issued on 13.07.2018 (responded on 18.08.2018) and 21.08.2018 (responded on 04.10.2018). Show-cause notice dated 24.09.2018 was also complied with on 04.10.2018.  No second show-cause or opportunity was given before levying the penalty on 20.03.2019. Penalty was imposed despite assessment being completed u/s 143(3), indicating substantive compliance. Delay in ap...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930