Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjay Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016–17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjay Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In the case Sanjay Kumar vs ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai considered an appeal against the imposition of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2016–17. The penalty of ₹1,89,887 was levied on account of alleged concealment of dividend income, which the assessee voluntarily disclosed during scrutiny by submitting a revised return. The assessee argued that the error was unintentional, arising from his status as a “Resident but not Ordinarily Resident” and the dividend not being credited to...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930