Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai restricts addition on cash deposits – Treats assessee as commission agent, estimates income at 4% instead of taxing entire deposits Assessee, an individual engaged in onion commission business, did not file return of income for AY 2012-13. Based on information of cash deposits of ₹1,00,31,039/- in ICICI Bank, AO issued notices u/s 148 & 142(1). As there was no compliance, AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 & completed it ex-parte u/s 144 r.w.s.147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A & made full add...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930