Case Law Details
Case Name : Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chennai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Subbiah Rajendran Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
ITAT Chennai restricts addition on cash deposits – Treats assessee as commission agent, estimates income at 4% instead of taxing entire deposits
Assessee, an individual engaged in onion commission business, did not file return of income for AY 2012-13. Based on information of cash deposits of ₹1,00,31,039/- in ICICI Bank, AO issued notices u/s 148 & 142(1). As there was no compliance, AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 & completed it ex-parte u/s 144 r.w.s.147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


