Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajesh Venkatesh Helavar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Rajesh Venkatesh Helavar Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) FTC Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Rule 128 Procedural, Sections 90 & 91 Substantive- ITAT Bangalore Background Assessee, an Indian resident individual, filed his return of income for AY 2019-20 & claimed Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) in respect of taxes paid outside India on income offered to tax in India. However, the CPC denied the FTC on the ground that Form 67-mandated under Rule 128-was not filed within the prescribed time. Assessee’s appeal before the CIT(A) was delayed by about 7 months. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay &...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930