Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tanisujan Infra Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tanisujan Infra Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Assessee filed quarterly TDS statements in Form 26Q for Q2, Q3 & Q4 of FY 2012-13 belatedly. CPC issued intimation u/s 200A levying late fee of ₹1,58,800 u/s 234E. On appeal, CIT(A) upheld levy relying on Madras HC ruling that 234E itself created liability from 01.07.2012 & section 200A(1)(c) was only a recovery mechanism. Before Tribunal, Assessee relied on Karnataka High Court decision in Fatheraj Singhvi v. UOI (289 CTR 602), which held that in absence of machinery provision prior to 01.06.2015, late fee u/s 234E could not b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930