Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chitradurga District Co-Op. Central Bank Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1937/Bang/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/09/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2012-2013
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs. Chitradurga District Co-Op. Central Bank Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)

If an assessee adopts the mercantile system of accounting and in his accounts he shows a particular income as accruing, whether that amount is really accrued or not is liable to bring the said income to tax. His accounts should reflect true and correct statement of affairs. Merely because the said amount accrued was not realised immediately cannot be a ground to avoid payment of tax. But, if in his account it is clearly stated though a particular income is due to him but it is not possible to recover the same, then it cannot be said to have been accrued and the said amount cannot be brought to tax. In the instant case, we are concerned with a non-performing asset. As the definition of non-performing asset shows an asset becomes non-performing when it ceases to yield income. Non-performing asset is an asset in respect of which interest has remained unpaid and has become past due. Once a particular asset is shown to be a non-performing asset, then the assumption is-it is not yielding any revenue. When it is not yielding any revenue, the question of showing that revenue and paying tax would not arise. As is clear from the policy guidelines issued by the National Housing Bank, the income from non-performing asset should be recognised only when it is actually received. That is what the Tribunal held in the instant case. Therefore, the contention of the Revenue that in respect of non- performing assets even though it does not yield any income as the assessee has adopted a mercantile system of accounting, he has to pay tax on the revenue which has accrued notionally is without any basis.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

These cross appeals are directed against the order dated 8.3.2018 passed by Ld. CIT(A) Davangere and they relate to the assessment year 2012-13.

2. The revenue is in appeal assailing the decision of Ld. CIT(A) in deleting the addition made in respect of interest income accrued on non-performing the assets.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031