Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Pawan Bhageria (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Pawan Bhageria (ITAT Pune) Interest Income from Debtors Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Loans: ITAT Pune Upholds Deletion of Section 69B Addition The Pune Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting an addition of ₹2.67 crore made u/s 69B on account of alleged unexplained loans and advances. The assessee, engaged in wholesale trading of yarn and also acting as a commission/del credere agent, had disclosed interest income of ₹26.72 lakh. The Assessing Officer observed that no corresponding loans or advances appeared ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930