Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Pawan Bhageria (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Pawan Bhageria (ITAT Pune) Interest Income from Debtors Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Loans: ITAT Pune Upholds Deletion of Section 69B Addition The Pune Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2018-19 and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting an addition of ₹2.67 crore made u/s 69B on account of alleged unexplained loans and advances. The assessee, engaged in wholesale trading of yarn and also acting as a commission/del credere agent, had disclosed interest income of ₹26.72 lakh. The Assessing Officer observed that no corresponding loans or advances appeared ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Specific Charge, No Penalty: Mumbai ITAT Cancels Section 270A Levy for Defective Notice Mere Investigation Wing Alert Is Not ‘Reason to Believe’: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Reopening Liquor Trader Gets Relief as ITAT Reduces GP Rate to 3.13% & Deletes Separate Expense Disallowance From Clean Chit to Crores in Penalty: SEBI Reopens Suzlon Case and Strikes Hard ITAT Restores Section 69 Matter to AO After Ex Parte Assessment and Appeal Orders View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930