Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Income Tax on distribution of surplus by companies / effective Income Tax planning

Advertisement


Considering the recent amendments in Income Tax Act, distribution to shareholder / promoter has become challenging, specifically post introduction of section 2(22)(e). The most viable options to distribute / pull out funds for promoter are incentive pay-out, dividend distribution and buy-back. It is worthwhile to note that dividend income is now taxable in hands of the shareholder and no longer exempt. Thus, off the 3 options listed above, buy-back is preferred option for an investor / shareholder / promoter to pull out the funds from direct tax angle. Though, entity needs to ensure adherence to other regulations specially the requirements / limits prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 & relevant rules.

Analysis:

Please see below tabulated tax impact under 3 alternatives i.e. dividend distribution (section 115O & 115BBDA), buy-back [115QA & 10(34)] and incentive pay-out (section 17):

Taxation in the hands of 115O & 115BBDA 115QA & 10 (34) 17
Shareholder
  • Individual’s → Prevailing tax slab rate
  • HNI → @ MMR i.e. 42.74%
  • Corporate → varies between 25.17% to 34.94%
Exempt u/s 10 (34)
  • Individual’s → Prevailing tax slab rate
  • HNI → @ MMR i.e. 42.74%
Company
  • Declared before April 1, 2020 → 20.56%
  • Declared after April 1, 2020 → Nil
Taxable → @ 23.296% Nil

 Conclusion:

Considering the above, most of the Companies will prefer to switch to buy-back option instead of distributing incentive or dividend to its shareholder / investor from a taxation perspective, but this may not always be feasible. The entity must be mindful of the fact that buy-back comes with inherent limitations. To say, the maximum amount that can be pulled out is 25% of the Company’s existing paid up capital & free reserves at a time, which is not the case in dividend & incentive pay-out. Also, debt : equity ratio cannot be more than twice the capital & free reserves. Needless to mention the compliance / adherence to regulations under Companies Act are cumbersome.

Reference:

1. Section 115BBDA – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

2. Section 10(34) – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

3. Section 115QA – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

4. Section 17 – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

Advertisement

Author Info

Chaitri Gathani
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Ankur Capital
Location: MUMBAI, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 15

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

1 Comment
  1. A private company (inc. 1988) has no liabilities. It has two shareholders (80% and 20% share holding) who are two directors. The company has two properties (worth about 6 crores) and some cash as fixed deposits in bank. Paidup capital is approx Rs. 3 Lakhs. The company is not doing any business since 3 years. The shareholders want to dissolve the company. Question: If the assets of the company are monetized and company goes for winding up, will shareholders have to pay LTCG Tax or as per slab rate, on distribution of funds?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *