Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Considering the recent amendments in Income Tax Act, distribution to shareholder / promoter has become challenging, specifically post introduction of section 2(22)(e). The most viable options to distribute / pull out funds for promoter are incentive pay-out, dividend distribution and buy-back. It is worthwhile to note that dividend income is now taxable in hands of the shareholder and no longer exempt. Thus, off the 3 options listed above, buy-back is preferred option for an investor / shareholder / promoter to pull out the funds from direct tax angle. Though, entity needs to ensure adherence to other regulations specially the requirements / limits prescribed under the Companies Act, 2013 & relevant rules.

Analysis:

Please see below tabulated tax impact under 3 alternatives i.e. dividend distribution (section 115O & 115BBDA), buy-back [115QA & 10(34)] and incentive pay-out (section 17):

Taxation in the hands of 115O & 115BBDA 115QA & 10 (34) 17
Shareholder
  • Individual’s → Prevailing tax slab rate
  • HNI → @ MMR i.e. 42.74%
  • Corporate → varies between 25.17% to 34.94%
Exempt u/s 10 (34)
  • Individual’s → Prevailing tax slab rate
  • HNI → @ MMR i.e. 42.74%
Company
  • Declared before April 1, 2020 → 20.56%
  • Declared after April 1, 2020 → Nil
Taxable → @ 23.296% Nil

 Conclusion:

Considering the above, most of the Companies will prefer to switch to buy-back option instead of distributing incentive or dividend to its shareholder / investor from a taxation perspective, but this may not always be feasible. The entity must be mindful of the fact that buy-back comes with inherent limitations. To say, the maximum amount that can be pulled out is 25% of the Company’s existing paid up capital & free reserves at a time, which is not the case in dividend & incentive pay-out. Also, debt : equity ratio cannot be more than twice the capital & free reserves. Needless to mention the compliance / adherence to regulations under Companies Act are cumbersome.

Reference:

1. Section 115BBDA – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

2. Section 10(34) – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

3. Section 115QA – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

4. Section 17 – https://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/pages/acts/income-tax-act.aspx

Sponsored

Tags:

Author Bio

I am a competent Chartered Accountant with proficient understanding and working knowledge IFRS, Indian GAAP, Direct Tax and Corporate Laws. 10+ years of post-qualification experience in investor relations/reporting across the globe, portfolio management, statutory audit of varied industries includin View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Budget 2021 – Goodwill, no longer a depreciable asset [effective from April 1, 2021] Prior govt approval needed for FDI from countries sharing land border with India Moratorium accounts not to be declared as NPA until further notice: SC Appointment of Independent & A Women Independent Director Platform for Transparent Taxation & faceless appeals launched by PM Modi View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. A K Bhatia says:

    A private company (inc. 1988) has no liabilities. It has two shareholders (80% and 20% share holding) who are two directors. The company has two properties (worth about 6 crores) and some cash as fixed deposits in bank. Paidup capital is approx Rs. 3 Lakhs. The company is not doing any business since 3 years. The shareholders want to dissolve the company. Question: If the assets of the company are monetized and company goes for winding up, will shareholders have to pay LTCG Tax or as per slab rate, on distribution of funds?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031