Case Law Details
Case Name : Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Conclusion: Revenue from film distribution was specifically excluded from the definition of “royalty” under both the Act and the India-USA DTAA and interest earned on income tax refund was not effectively connected with any permanent establishment in India and should be taxed at 15% as per Article 11(2) of the India-US DTAA.
Held: Assessee, a tax resident of the USA, was engaged in the distribution of films and had entered into an agreement with Warner Bros. Pictures (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“WBPIPL”) granting exclusive distribution rights ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

