Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Conclusion: Revenue from film distribution was specifically excluded from the definition of “royalty” under both the Act and the India-USA DTAA and interest earned on income tax refund was not effectively connected with any permanent establishment in India and should be taxed at 15% as per Article 11(2) of the India-US DTAA. Held: Assessee, a tax resident of the USA, was engaged in the distribution of films and had entered into an agreement with Warner Bros. Pictures (India) Pvt. Ltd. (“WBPIPL”) granting exclusive distribution rights ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930