Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Warner Bros Distributing Inc. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Conclusion: Revenue from film distribution was specifically excluded from the definition of “royalty” under both the Act and the India-USA DTAA and interest earned on income tax refund was not effectively connected with any permanent establishment in India and should be taxed at 15% as per Article 11(2) of the India-US DTAA.

Held: Assessee, a tax resident of the USA, was engaged in the distribution of films and had entered into an agreement with Warner Bros. Pictures (India) Pvt. Ltd. (

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031