Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income Tax Officer (Central) Vs Mr. Gope M. Rochlani (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 7737/Mum./2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/05/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In our considered opinion, once the legislature has not specified the “due date” as provided in section 139(1) in Explanation 5A, then by implication, it has to be taken as the date extended under section 139(4). In view of the above, we hold that the assessee gets the benefit / immunity under clause (b) of Explanation to section 271(1)(c) because the assessee has filed its return of income within the “due date” and, therefore, the penalty levied by the Assessing Officer cannot be sustained on this ground. Even though we are not affirming the findings and the conclusions of the learned Commissioner (Appeals), however, as per the discussion made above, penalty is deleted in view of the interpretation of Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c). Consequently, the ground raised by the Revenue is treated as dismissed.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “G” BENCH, MUMBAI
BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031