Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohd Zaheeruddin Zeeshan Ayub Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mohd Zaheeruddin Zeeshan Ayub Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

Learned Counsel  contended during the course of hearing that this assessee is drawing salary income on regular basis and it was only in the impugned assessment year that he had carried out corresponding transactions requiring audit report u/s.44AB of the Act. He therefore pleaded assessee’s ignorance only as a reasonable cause u/s. 273 for deleting the impugned penalty under Section 271B.

We have given our thoughtful consideration to

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031