Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs K K Ventura (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs K K Ventura (ITAT Mumbai) Identity, PAN, ITR & Repayment Proved – ITAT Rules in Favour of Assessee on Unsecured Loans- Suspicion No Substitute for Evidence: ITAT Mumbai Upholds CIT(A) in ₹8.43 Cr Unsecured Loan Case Case Background Assessee: K K Ventura LLP, engaged in financing & trading. Issue: Sharp rise in unsecured loans (₹21.03 Cr vs ₹6.25 Cr in prior year), squared-up loan transactions & borrowings from non-filers. AO’s Action: Added ₹8.43 Cr u/s 68 as unexplained unsecured loans + disallowed ₹29.95 Lakh interest (AY 2018–19). HC Intervention: Bombay ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031