This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
IBNR Provisioning is Not Contingent Liability & deductible U/s 37: Delhi HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCIT Vs Care Health Insurance Limited (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT Vs Care Health Insurance Limited (Delhi High Court)
In the case of PCIT vs. Care Health Insurance Limited, the Delhi High Court addressed significant questions concerning the tax treatment of provisions made by an insurance company for unsettled claims and Incurred But Not Reported (IBNR) claims. The dispute arose from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s (ITAT) decision to delete the disallowance of these provisions, which had been claimed as deductions by Care Health Insurance Limited under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Background and Issues
The Principal Commissioner of ...
