Case Law Details

Case Name : Google India Private Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : SA No.206/Bang/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/12/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts : All ITAT (7635) ITAT Bangalore (466)

Google India Private Limited Vs JCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

By this Stay Petition, the assessee is seeking to stay the recovery of outstanding tax arrears of Rs.1260,56,49,209.

2. Originally the stay was granted vide the order dated 20.11.2019 of the Tribunal in SP No. 293/Bang/2019, for a period of six months. As per the original stay order of the Tribunal, the assessee was directed to pay Rs. 15 crore towards the outstanding tax demand within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the order. The assessee had complied with the conditions mentioned by the Tribunal for the grant of stay. Later, the stay against recovery of outstanding tax arrears was extended vide order dated 11.09.2020 in SP No. 129/Bang/2020. By the second order of stay, the recovery of outstanding demand was stayed for a period of six months from 05.06.2020 or till the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier. The appeal was posted for hearing on 08.10.2020, however, the same was adjourned by the Bench to 05.01.2021 to wait the outcome of the preceding year pending adjudication before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka.

3. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. Non disposal of appeal cannot be attributed due to the fault of the assessee. The assessee has already complied with the conditions mentioned in the stay orders passed by the Tribunal. Therefore, the facts remaining the same, we are of the view that the stay needs to be extended for a further period of six months or till the disposal of the appeal whichever is earlier. The appeal has already been posted for hearing on 05.01.2021. The assessee shall not seek adjournment in the matter. Therefore, the stay against recovery of outstanding tax arrears is extended beyond the period of 365 days in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Pepsi Foods P. Ltd. v. ACIT & Anr. reported in 376 ITR 87. It is ordered accordingly.

4. In the result, the Stay Petition filed by the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced on this 11th day of December, 2020.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

January 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031