Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinayaka Projects Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinayaka Projects Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Opted for Postal, Got Only Email: ITAT Sets Aside Ex-Parte NFAC Order- Documents Already on Record—Assessee Gets Fresh Chance Before CIT(A) Assessee appealed against CIT(A)/NFAC order dated 20.05.2025 which dismissed the appeal ex parte. Assessment was reopened u/s 147 & completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/144B making an addition of Rs.2,75,00,000/- towards unexplained investment in purchase of immovable property. Assessee contended that the source of investment was sale proceeds from development of site & had filed Form 26AS, bank statements & ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031