Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajul Jayendra Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Rajul Jayendra Shah Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Explained LRS Remittances Can’t Be Taxed as Peak Credit: ITAT Mumbai Deletes s.68 Addition on Foreign Bank Balance ITAT Mumbai (D Bench) in Rajul Jayendra Shah vs DCIT (ITA No. 6512/Mum/2025, AY 2017-18, order dated 24.12.2025) has allowed the assessee’s appeal, deleting the addition of ₹1.72 crore u/s 68 made on account of alleged unexplained peak balance in a foreign bank account. The Assessee had two Wells Fargo (USA) bank accounts, which were scrutinised under CASS. The AO added the combined peak balance of ₹3.47 crore, alleging lack of exp...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031