Case Law Details
Case Name : Shreenath Motors Pvt. Ltd Vs CIT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Cousel fo the Assessee submits that , the ITAT had erred in confirming the disallowance of expenditure on remuneration and training of a working Director of the Appellant-Assessee that was incurred legitimately for the efficient management and conduct of the Appellant-Assessee’s business. He submitted that the expenditure was not only legitimate but had a direct nexus with the business of the Appellant-Assessee and was therefore allowable as a deduction under section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is in this light that the learned counsel has questioned the correctness of the impugned or...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Points for consideration:-
-The expenditure incurred in the interest of business.
-The expenditure not in personal nature.
-Decision taken for meet out education expenses should be taken by the management through under taking.
-Business of the company and feild of education should be the same.
-Higher education in the related field would prove beneficial for the company
-Principle laid down in these judgments also should be considered: Jhalani Holding Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO 42 TTJ 116 (Delhi), Karnataka High Court in Mac Explotec (P) Ltd v CIT (2006) 155 Taxman 247), Bombay High Court considered this point in Sakal Papers (P) Ltd v CIT (114 ITR 256), Madhya Pradesh High Court in CIT v Kohinoor Paper Products (226 ITR 220)