Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Simon Pavan Kumar Moses Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Assessee filed appeal with 28 days’ delay, explaining through affidavit that he was unaware of the IT portal process & could download the CIT(A)’s order only with assistance from a CA’s office in the first week of March 2025. Tribunal, noting the explanation as reasonable & with no serious objection from the Department, condoned the delay & admitted the appeal. Assessee’s case was reopened u/s 147 on the ground that capital gains from property transfer had escaped assessment. Assessee failed to respond to notice u/s 148 & ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031