Case Law Details
Case Name : Ginjala Atchiraju Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Visakhapatnam
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ginjala Atchiraju Vs ITO (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that mere estimate of cost by Departmental Valuer could not constitute material to concealment and therefore levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act is not valid.
Facts- A survey operation u/s. 133A of the Act was carried out in the case of the assessee. During the course of the survey operations, it was noticed that Sri Ginjala Simhadri Raju along with his daughter sold land and buildings. However, the assessee filed a return of income by admitting business income of Rs. 3,18,120/- and capital gains at...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

