Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Panduranga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Satish Panduranga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Satish Panduranga filed an appeal before the ITAT Bangalore against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18. The AO had made an addition of Rs. 6,29,94,000 during the financial year 2016-17 based on non-reply to a notice issued during the assessment proceedings. The NFAC confirmed the AO’s order as the assessee had not complied with the notices. The assessee requested one more opportu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31