Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Satish Panduranga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Satish Panduranga Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Satish Panduranga filed an appeal before the ITAT Bangalore against the order passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) under section 250 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2017-18. The AO had made an addition of Rs. 6,29,94,000 during the financial year 2016-17 based on non-reply to a notice issued during the assessment proceedings. The NFAC confirmed the AO’s order as the assessee had not complied with the notices. The assessee requested one more opportunity to present their case before the NFAC. The ITAT Bangalore conside...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930