Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194J on payments to expatriate employees seconded to taxpayer

Case Law Details

Case Name
Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: When expatriate employees seconded to taxpayer had worked as employees of the taxpayer company, their salary had been rightly subjected to section 192 and Explanation to section 9(1)(vii) which apparently made it clear that salary would not fall within the expression ‘fee for technical services’ and had no applicability to the facts and circumstances of the case. Consequently, AO was not justified in disallowing u/s 40(a)(i) for non deduction of TDS on payments which were actually in the nature of ‘Fee for technical services (FTS)â€...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *