This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194J on payments to expatriate employees seconded to taxpayer
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2012-13
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Boeing India Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Conclusion: When expatriate employees seconded to taxpayer had worked as employees of the taxpayer company, their salary had been rightly subjected to section 192 and Explanation to section 9(1)(vii) which apparently made it clear that salary would not fall within the expression ‘fee for technical services’ and had no applicability to the facts and circumstances of the case. Consequently, AO was not justified in disallowing u/s 40(a)(i) for non deduction of TDS on payments which were actually in the nature of ‘Fee for technical services (FTS)â€...





