Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhanu Pratap Gohel Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhanu Pratap Gohel Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) ITAT Gives Major Relief in Demonetisation Cash Deposit Case – Only 5% Estimated Profit Taxable, Section 115BBE Not Applicable Assessee deposited ₹13.50 lakh in cash during demonetisation (Nov–Dec 2016). She explained that the funds came from earlier bank withdrawals, supported by cash books, bank statements, Hathu account & affidavit citing old age/medical needs. AO ignored these documents & added the entire ₹13.50 lakh u/s 69A, which was confirmed by CIT(A) without identifying any defects. Before ITAT, Assessee proved a clear nexus betwe...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930