Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Puttaraju Hemavathi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Puttaraju Hemavathi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that delay in filing of appeal due to non-registration on Income Tax portal and non-receipt of notices are plausible and sufficient cause show. Accordingly, delay condoned and appeal restored back for fresh consideration.

Facts- AO concluded the reassessment proceedings by adding entire sale consideration of Rs. 55,80,000/- as short term capital gain. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal of the assessee by not condoning the delay of 147 days and did not admit the appeal for adjudication, as it is a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031