This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Deduction u/s 54F not eligible as more than one residential property already owned
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Surendra Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-2011
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Hyderabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Surendra Babu Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
ITAT Hyderabad held that benefit of deduction under section 54F not eligible as the assessee owns more than one residential property on the date of transfer of the capital asset other than the new asset acquired.
Facts- The Pr. CIT initiated proceedings u/s 263 of the I.T. Act on the ground that AO has allowed the claim of deduction u/s 54F without proper verification of the facts in the wake of assessee’s contention that some of the properties were given on rent and hence commercial in nature.
Accordingly, AO asked the assessee to explain as to why ded...




