Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajiv Madhok Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2291/Del/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/05/2020
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajiv Madhok Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

The issue under consideration is whether disallowance of claim u/s 54F will be  sustain under Act?

In the present case, the assessee, an individual, sold his shares and claimed tax deduction under section 54F by stating that he invested in the purchase/construction of the property. He claimed that the said purchase was within the time period provided in section 54F of the Act and thus, he is entitled to not charging of long-term capital gain to the extent of investment in purchase/construction of the residential house property.

The contention of the assessee is that since final consideration was paid and the possession of flat was received within a period of one year prior to the date of transfer of capital asset, the same should be considered as the date of purchase. Whereas, the stand of Department is that the date of execution of agreement for purchase of flat should be considered as the date of purchase.

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Smt. Beena K. Jain decided the issue in favour of the assessee by answering the question as under :

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031