Case Law Details
Case Name : Factiva Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Factiva Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Mumbai Tribunal has once again reaffirmed its consistent view that payments received by the UK-based company for providing database access to its Indian distributor Dow Jones Consulting India Pvt. Ltd. (DJCIPL) & subscription fees from KPMG cannot be treated as “royalty” either u/s 9(1)(vi) of the Act or under Article 13(2) of the India–UK DTAA. Tribunal also held that DJCIPL does not constitute a Dependent Agent Permanent Establishment (DAPE) of the assessee in India.
Assessee, a UK tax resident engaged in providing global bus
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


