Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Udaya Ravi Arecanut Company Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Udaya Ravi Arecanut Company Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Principle of Substantial Justice V/s Technical Consideration – Not Condoning Delay Would Amount to Legalising an Illegal Order ITAT Bangalore in the case of Udaya Ravi Arecanut Company V/s ITO  ruled that Govt. cannot retain even a single pie of citizen’s money as tax, when it is not authorised by any law. CPC Bengaluru in Intimation u/s 143(1), disallowed TDS credit partially which was appearing in Form 26AS. Assessee had filed rectification application u/s 154 & was under honest & bona fide belief that outcome would resolve...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai Section 28 Land Acquisition Interest Exempt as Enhanced Compensation: ITAT Delhi Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Be Based on Suspicion Alone: ITAT Chennai Section 69 Addition Deleted as No Evidence Linked Joint Holder to Alleged On-Money: ITAT Mumbai WhatsApp Chats Accepted as Evidence, On-Money Addition Limited to 25%: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031