Case Law Details
Case Name : R.L.Traders Vs ITO (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the Case
The Hon’ble High Court in this case held that when there is an assumption that the assessee did not maintain quantitative details of ingredients such as mixing gum, starch and oil, the conclusion could not be affirmed. As, decisions can’t be on the basis of mere Assumptions or Presumptions.
Facts of the Case
The assessee carries on his business in preparation and trading of Hing. The assessee filed its return for the Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11 and declared an income of ₹3,15,210/-. In the scrutiny the Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the turn-over figures and the G.P...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

