Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Krunal Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Krunal Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Computation Error Isn’t Misreporting – ITAT Ahmedabad Deletes Penalty u/s 270A for 54F Deduction Difference Assessee filed appeal against levy of penalty u/s 270A(9) for alleged misreporting of income arising from excess claim of deduction u/s 54F. AO held that Assessee wrongly claimed full exemption of ₹1.17 crore instead of proportionate deduction of ₹91.60 lakh & imposed penalty for misreporting. The CIT(A)/NFAC confirmed the penalty. Before ITAT, Assessee argued that all particulars were fully disclosed & the issue was one of interpret...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031