Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Syedali Ebrahim Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Syedali Ebrahim Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Cochin ITAT Restores 68 Addition on Capital Account to AO for Fresh Verification- Transfer from Housing Loan to Capital Account Needs Deeper Scrutiny Assessee challenged the order of CIT(A)/NFAC dated 19.06.2025 which had upheld additions made by AO in scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3). AO assessed income at ₹1,15,31,681 as against returned income of ₹16,04,380, mainly by (a) treating ₹97,27,301 credited in capital account as unexplained u/s 68, & (b) disallowing ₹2,00,000 claimed as loss from self-occupied property. Assessee submitted that the in...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930