Case Law Details
Case Name : Shilpa Prabhakar Kulkarni Vs DCIT Centralized Processing Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Shilpa Prabhakar Kulkarni Vs DCIT Centralized Processing Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that as no claim of the amount of exempted allowance was made in the return of income, the same cannot be rectified as there was no mistake apparent from record in order passed u/s 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act.
Facts- The assessee is mainly aggrieved with the rejection of claim of rectification of the assessee and upholding the disallowance of Rs.35,26,484/ – i.e. which
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Whether Revision u/s. 264 should have been filed against intimation u/s. 143(1), instead of rectification.?
Kindly give opinion, Thanks.