Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shilpa Prabhakar Kulkarni Vs DCIT Centralized Processing Centre (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 387/MUM/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/05/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shilpa Prabhakar Kulkarni Vs DCIT Centralized Processing Centre (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that as no claim of the amount of exempted allowance was made in the return of income, the same cannot be rectified as there was no mistake apparent from record in order passed u/s 143(

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Prakash Kochar says:

    Whether Revision u/s. 264 should have been filed against intimation u/s. 143(1), instead of rectification.?
    Kindly give opinion, Thanks.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031