Case Law Details
Case Name : Gujarat Power Corporation Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Gujarat High Court at Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 29792 of 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/07/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Assessee put forth his claim for exemption under section 10(23G) of the Act with respect to three different incomes, namely, (1) interest from SSNNL bonds, (2) interest from GIPCL bonds, and (3) capital gain from sale of shares by GPEC. Such claim was supported by the notes forming part of the return of income. It is
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
The case has , one should say, very well and ably argued; hence the ruling of the court been well founded.
The one basic common sense question to intelligently ask in all such disputes is – whose duty it is, other than of AO, to make an ‘assessment’ in its profoundly intended sense (the only possible sense), even on the first occasion ; a proper one at that ? The obvious inescapable answer would conceivably have been no different from what the one given by the HC.
The buck does not stop there; for, another follow-on question that perforce arises is, – why then such disputes are continued , or allowed, to be taken beyond the tribunal stage ?
Only time , future, can answer ! Provided , of couse, the concerned peopole (including the revenue and professionals, alike) are interested in and sincerely look for righteous clues, and decide to adapt them; One such open avenue for free are the several published articles and lectures, of no less a personality / legal luminary than the legendary, N A pAlkhivala.