Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Srinivas Arra Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Srinivas Arra Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) CIT(A) Cannot Dismiss in Limine for non-prosecution without deciding the issue on merits Assessee, an individual, filed his return of income for AY 2017-18 on 30.03.2018 declaring total income of ₹4,80,730/-. The case was reopened & reassessment was completed u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B on 27.09.2021. During the demonetisation period, Assessee had deposited ₹25,03,554/- in cash in his bank account. As Assessee failed to explain the source of the cash deposits with supporting evidence, AO treated the entire amount as unexplained money & assessed total i...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930