Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

CIT(A) cannot accept Additional Evidence in Violation of Rule 46A

Case Law Details

Case Name
DCIT Vs Allied Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2013-14 and 2014-15
Advertisement
DCIT Vs Allied Offshore Services Pvt. Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) It has categorically come on record that remand report though called by Ld. CIT(A) during appellate proceedings has not been referred to in the impugned orders. When additional evidence entertained by the CIT(A) has not been brought on record in accordance with Rule 46A subsequent findings on the same are vitiated because there is not even a whisper of remand report admittedly submitted in this case by the AO. Secondly the AO has not got the opportunity to examine the agreement on the basis of which services have been rendered and commiss...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *