Case Law Details
Case Name : Ganesh Ramchandra More Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganesh Ramchandra More Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO
The ITAT Pune partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, primarily holding that enhancement by CIT(A) without issuing mandatory notice u/s 251(2) is invalid, and accordingly quashed the enhancement of income and related directions for penalty proceedings u/s 271D.
On merits, the Tribunal held that indexed cost of acquisition must be allowed while computing capital gains. Since the assessee had not furnished the purchase deed earlier, the matter was restored to the AO for f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


