Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ganesh Ramchandra More Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ganesh Ramchandra More Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO The ITAT Pune partly allowed the appeal of the assessee, primarily holding that enhancement by CIT(A) without issuing mandatory notice u/s 251(2) is invalid, and accordingly quashed the enhancement of income and related directions for penalty proceedings u/s 271D. On merits, the Tribunal held that indexed cost of acquisition must be allowed while computing capital gains. Since the assessee had not furnished the purchase deed earlier, the matter was restored to the AO for f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031