Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Change of opinion by AO by requesting CIT to exercise 263 Section jurisdiction is not permitted

Case Law Details

Case Name
Om Prakash Agarwal Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2017-18
Advertisement
Om Prakash Agarwal Vs PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT held  that the prerequisite exercise of jurisdiction by the learned Principal CIT under section 263 of the Act is that the order of the AO is established to be erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The Principal CIT has to be satisfied of twin conditions, namely (i) the order of the AO sought to be revised is erroneous; and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. If any one of them is absent i.e., if the assessment order is not erroneous but it is prejudicial to the Revenue, provision of section 2...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

PRAVIN SARASWAT
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: SARASWAT & COMPANY
Location: JAIPUR, Rajasthan
Articles Published: 37

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *