Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

Vide its order dated 30.09.2015 CBDT has extended due date only for the state of Haryana, Punjab , Union Territory of Chandigarh and Gujarat.

Download Official Copy of the orders in PDF Format

F.No.225/207/2016/ITA.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North-Block, TA.II Division

New Delhi dated the 30th of September, 2015

Order under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The Central Board of Direct Taxes, in compliance to the order of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 29.09.2015 in case of Vishal Garg & Ors. vs Union of India & Anr.; CWP 19770/2015 and in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’), hereby orders that the returns of income due to be e-Flied by 30th September, 2015 may be filed by 31st October, 2015 in cases of Income-tax assessees of the State(s) of Punjab and Haryana and Union Territory of Chandigarh.

2. This order shall be subject to the outcome of any further appeal/SLP which the CBDT may file against the said Judgment.

(Rohit Garg)

Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India

——————————

F.No.225/207/2016/ITA.II
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes

North-Block, TA.II Division New Delhi dated the 30th of September, 2015

Order under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961

The Central Board of Direct Taxes, in compliance to the order of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court dated 29.09.2015 in case of All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants vs. CBDT ; Special Civil Application No. 15075 of 2015  and in exercise of powers conferred under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’), hereby orders that the returns of income due to be e-Flied by 30th September, 2015 may be filed by 31st October, 2015 in cases of Income-tax assessees of the State of Gujarat.

2. This order shall be subject to the outcome of any further appeal/SLP which the CBDT may file against the said Judgment.

(Rohit Garg)

Deputy-Secretary to the Government of India

Latest Status of various Petitions in High Courts for Extension of Tax Audit Due Date –

Tax Audit Date Extension- Status of High Courts Appeals

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Raghunandan Magotra says:

    Nice Work CBDT . it shows your spirits ” Give only to those who have the gutts to snatch. bheekh mangany balai ko qun dena”

    But remember in the end the meek will rule the world.

  2. ramanathan says:

    what an attitude the CBDT has. Mother will never have partiality towards sons.

    Why assessee’s in other states should suffer.

    IS LAW AND PROVISIONS OF THE ACT COMMON TO EVERYONE

  3. Digesh Rambhia says:

    All state who haven’t got the extension should now file a case against CBDT on the grounds of discrimination and S/119 conditional order. And specifically the officer signing the order should be held responsible and be taken as party to the case specifically

  4. T.R.Bhave says:

    What about the state of Karnataka. The High Court had directed CBDT to report to
    the Court about extension of date. Whether only return filing date is extended or
    tax audit date is also extended.

  5. ADV. SANJAYKUMAR THAKKAR says:

    Dear Friends,
    Rather then commenting here lets all act together as team. Lets stop dealing with IT Department for assessments till 31.03.2016 and even lets all stop filing returns. This will surely impact the flow of revenue and even the officers will be pinched by the pressure of completing assessment till 31.03.2016. And then we have to see how CBDT manages the time limit. If we all protest by our action rather then words, it will have great impact.

  6. nandakumar says:

    how can the law be different to different states? cbit is penalising those states who have not filed writ petitions>
    if so they should give relief only to those who filed cases and not even to the entire state?
    very pitable handling

  7. CA Harshit Kabra says:

    CBDT has not clarified in the due date is also extended for furnishing Audit Report also, which requires clarification from CBDT.

    CA Harshit Kabra

    Reply

  8. Ajay Maheshwari says:

    If this is not a fake notification, then it is a “LOL” notification.

    The CBDT believes that it has done wrong only with assessees of the specified states.

    Really…cant stop laughing…

  9. Vikram Thanvi says:

    Why only for those Areas. Someday, some district court will direct CBDT then, whether it will give this kind of extension for that district only. It should be given to all. I hope they will consider it by 5 pm today.

  10. ADV. SANJAYKUMAR THAKKAR says:

    Well Honestly dont understand what to comment on this kind of notification ? People have to be careful in selecting government.

  11. s ramachandra rao says:

    what a peevish way of looking at issues. Now all associations will have to move the courts again to get a reprieve. All other conditions being equal how can some people alone gain over the rest

  12. Ashwani Joshi says:

    The order of the Hon’ble P & H High court is not dated 28/09/2015 as given in notification but 29/09/2015. Please correct it. Irresponsibility is clear. Stubbornness is our habit.

  13. Anas Rasheed says:

    Dear Sir,

    It is requested to CBDT that extention of date from 30 September to 31 October shall be applicable to all states as the same problems exist with the practitioner across the country. It will be a kind of injustice to the assessees of the other states

  14. Ashwani Joshi says:

    Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana did not pronounce judgement on 28th Sept 2015 as given in notification.It was pronounced on 29.09.2015. The officer is not uptodate. But stubbornness is there. Double standards.

  15. Dhaval says:

    Very weird decision. Did institute never passed any of the person at the helm right now?

    Shall we not file RTIs in the working and delays of the CBDT?

  16. nilesh lad says:

    whether above news is true only extends date of tax audit is only in punjab,haryana and gujarat state
    What about other States
    Pls.repy if any upadtes

  17. NEERAJ GUPTA says:

    दुसरे राज्य क्या देश का हिस्सा नहीं हैं जो केवल इनके लिए ही ये दरियादिली हुई है

  18. Manan Gupta says:

    This order shall be subject to the outcome of any further appeal/SLP which the CBDT may file against the said Judgment.

    Will some one please elaborate this Line.

  19. Chintan says:

    So now CBDT wants people to file writs in all High Courts if everyone gets extension.
    That means they want to increase work of all HCs.

    Mockery of law and spirit.

    BTW, Bombay HC had given judgement that if one HC gives judgement on Section 226, it is binding on all HC of country. Lets see what is implication of that judgement.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031