Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jehan Percy Variava Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jehan Percy Variava Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) In the matter abovementioned ITAT deleted addition made on account of undisclosed cash deposits during demonetization period after observing that assessee has substantiate means of income for depositing cash. Assessee filed his ITR for AY 2017-18 declaring nil income. The case was selected for scrutiny on the issue of large agricultural income shown in ITR and cash deposits during demonetization period. During assessment, AO recorded that assessee was given several opportunities by issuing show cause notice, to explain the source of cash deposit of Rs.24...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930