Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jehan Percy Variava Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jehan Percy Variava Vs ITO (ITAT Surat)

In the matter abovementioned ITAT deleted addition made on account of undisclosed cash deposits during demonetization period after observing that assessee has substantiate means of income for depositing cash.

Assessee filed his ITR for AY 2017-18 declaring nil income. The case was selected for scrutiny on the issue of large agricultural income shown in ITR and cash deposits during demonetization period. During assessment, AO recorded that assessee was given several opportunities by issuing show cause notice, to explain the source of ca

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31