Case Law Details
Case Name : Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Rajkot
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Presumptive Income u/s 44AD Covers Cash Deposits – No Further 69A Addition; Entire ₹13.71 Lakh Deleted in Assessee’s Favour
Assessee, a small trader in cutlery, did not file return u/s 139(1) as his income was below taxable limit. AO obtained information of cash deposits of ₹13,71,365 in Union Bank account & issued notice u/s 148 on 27.03.2019. Assessee replied but did not file return in time. AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, ignor
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


