Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Hanif Osman Ravda Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)

Presumptive Income u/s 44AD Covers Cash Deposits – No Further 69A Addition; Entire ₹13.71 Lakh Deleted in Assessee’s Favour

Assessee, a small trader in cutlery, did not file return u/s 139(1) as his income was below taxable limit. AO obtained information of cash deposits of ₹13,71,365 in Union Bank account & issued notice u/s 148 on 27.03.2019. Assessee replied but did not file return in time. AO completed assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, treating the entire cash deposits as unexplained money u/s 69A, ignor

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728