Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Paradise Rubber Industries Vs PCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Appeal Number : I.T.A No. 115/ASR/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 24/09/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Paradise Rubber Industries Vs PCIT (ITAT Amritsar)

Admittedly the present case before us is a case of Limited scrutiny selected for particular points reproduced hereinabove confined to 4 issues. The issue for which the PCIT issued the show cause notice was entirely different than the four issues examined under limited scrutiny by the assessing officer. The Board in its circular mentioned the procedure for converting the limited scrutiny case into full-fledged scrutiny. The said circular was reproduced by the PCIT in the impugned order before us. From the perusal of the above said circular, it is abundantly clear that the conditions, which are sine qua non were non-existence. Therefore, the assessing officer did not have to convert or make a request for a limited scrutiny case to full-fledged scrutiny.

Since the assessing officer was only required to decide the issues specifically selected under Limited scrutiny and was not required to examine or sufficiently enquire the matters which are not referred to him as alleged by the PCIT. Once the assessing officer was required to apply his mind to the specific issues, which were duly dealt by the assessing officer in the order passed by him, it cannot be said that the order passed by the assessing officer was erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The revenue in its wisdom has directed the assessing Officer to decide the specific issues and laid down the condition of deviation from the specific issues after fulfilling the requirement of the circular issued by the Board in this regard. Once the AO had scrupulously discharged the duty assigned to him, it cannot be said by PCIT that the order passed by the assessing officer was erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. In light of the above, we fully agree with the submission made by the assessee before us. We respectfully rely upon the decision referred hereinabove by the AR of the assessee and did not find the judgments referred by the Ld. PCIT in order in support of order are applicable.

 As a result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed on ground No. 1 alone.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AMRITSAR

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031