Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sabeena Silk Mills Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sabeena Silk Mills Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai: No Set-Off of Brought Forward Business Loss Against Short-Term Capital Gains on Depreciated Assets u/s 50 Mumbai ITAT held that brought forward business losses cannot be set off against short-term capital gains (STCG) computed u/s 50 on the sale of depreciated assets forming part of a block of assets, as such gains are taxable strictly under the head “Capital Gains” & section 41(2) has no application in such cases. Assessee filed its return declaring ₹1,78,62,050 as capital gains u/s 50 from the sale of depreciated business assets,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930