Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Amar Ghanasingh (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Amar Ghanasingh (ITAT Mumbai) Entire Purchase Can’t Be Disallowed When Sales Are Accepted—Only 3% Profit Element to Be Taxed on Bogus Purchases—ITAT Mumbai Follows Consistency Rule The Revenue filed appeal against the order of NFAC (CIT(A)) dated 13.06.2025 for AY 2013-14 where relief had been granted to M/s Amar Ghanasingh, a jewellery manufacturer & trader. During scrutiny, AO alleged that the Assessee had made purchases of ₹ 9.40 crore from five entities linked with the Bhanwarlal Jain Group—identified as accommodation entry providers. Holding these to be non-genuine, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930