Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Amar Ghanasingh (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Amar Ghanasingh (ITAT Mumbai)

Entire Purchase Can’t Be Disallowed When Sales Are Accepted—Only 3% Profit Element to Be Taxed on Bogus Purchases—ITAT Mumbai Follows Consistency Rule

The Revenue filed appeal against the order of NFAC (CIT(A)) dated 13.06.2025 for AY 2013-14 where relief had been granted to M/s Amar Ghanasingh, a jewellery manufacturer & trader.

During scrutiny, AO alleged that the Assessee had made purchases of ₹ 9.40 crore from five entities linked with the Bhanwarlal Jain Group—identified as accommodation entry p

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Routine Business Cash Deposits Not Taxable Despite No ITR Section 56(2)(vii)(b) Addition Overturned for Earlier Property Booking Revenue’s Section 68 Challenge Rejected on Evidence and Repayment Advance Loss Treated as Trading Loss: ITAT Allows ₹1.5 Cr Write-Off Finance Broker Taxed Only on Brokerage as No Evidence of Income Found View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031