Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jain Brothers Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jain Brothers Vs NFAC (ITAT Delhi) Goods Came by Cycle Rickshaw, but Justice Arrived by ITAT- ITAT Delhi Deletes Addition on ‘Bogus Purchases’ – “Cycle Rickshaw or Not, Sales Were Real!” Assessee, a Delhi-based firm, was subjected to reassessment u/s 147 on the basis of information that it had made bogus purchases of ₹6,41,900 from M/s Balaji Trading Company, alleged to be a non-existent entity. AO treated the said purchases as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C r.w.s. 115BBE, holding that the supplier was inactive on the GST portal & hence fictitious. Assessee contended that the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930