Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Anil Jairam Goel (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Anil Jairam Goel (ITAT Pune) In these appeals, Revenue challenged the order of CIT(A)/NFAC restricting addition on bogus purchases to 12.5% instead of sustaining 100% disallowance made by AO. Assessee, an individual, had originally filed return declaring income of ₹4,76,993/- for AY 2011-12. Based on Sales Tax Department information, it was found that Assessee had obtained bogus purchase bills of ₹2,53,72,426/- from five hawala parties. After reopening u/s 148,  AO issued multiple notices u/s 142(1) & 133(6). Assessee failed to respond &  remained absent. All notices issue...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Excess Stock in Survey = Business Income, Not 115BBE Hit – ITAT Pune Draws Clear Line No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim Updated Return Can’t Kill Genuine Exemption – ITAT Allows Section 11 Relief Despite Delay Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031