Case Law Details
Case Name : ITO Vs Anil Jairam Goel (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Anil Jairam Goel (ITAT Pune)
In these appeals, Revenue challenged the order of CIT(A)/NFAC restricting addition on bogus purchases to 12.5% instead of sustaining 100% disallowance made by AO. Assessee, an individual, had originally filed return declaring income of ₹4,76,993/- for AY 2011-12. Based on Sales Tax Department information, it was found that Assessee had obtained bogus purchase bills of ₹2,53,72,426/- from five hawala parties. After reopening u/s 148, AO issued multiple notices u/s 142(1) & 133(6). Assessee failed to respond & remained absent. All notices issue...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


