Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pradeep Kumar Dusad Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pradeep Kumar Dusad Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur Holds 153C Valid but Deletes On-Money & Bogus LTCG Additions; Firm’s Investment Not Taxable in Partner’s Hands & CIT(A) Cannot Direct Reopening u/s 148 In this search-based case, AO issued notice u/s 153C to Pradeep Kumar Dusad &  made three additions: alleged on-money of ₹1.45 crore on land purchase, bogus LTCG of ₹44.68 lakh on penny stock shares, &  commission. The CIT(A) held 153C invalid &  deleted the additions but directed the AO to reopen the LTCG issue u/s 148. Both parties appealed. Tribunal first he...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031