Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Trident Group Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Trident Group Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) ₹1.02 Cr Disallowance u/s 14A Upheld: Large Investment Portfolio Cannot Be Managed at ‘Zero Cost’, Holds ITAT Chandigarh The Chandigarh Bench “B” of the ITAT dismissed the appeal of M/s Trident Group Limited for AY 2017-18 and upheld disallowance of ₹1,02,44,219 u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D. The assessee had earned substantial exempt dividend income of ₹22.42 crore from an investment portfolio exceeding ₹124 crore and claimed that no expenditure, except ₹5,774 towards demat charges, was incurred to earn such income, asserting that invest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Quashes U/s 153C Assessments: AO Cannot Simply Copy Satisfaction Note Reopening Quashed: AO Added Share Capital, Loan & Premium Without Understanding Transaction Nature WhatsApp Chats, Screenshots & Suspicion Can’t Prove On-Money: ITAT Jaipur ITAT Directs TDS Refund Despite Delayed E-Verification; Revenue Cannot Retain Tax on Technical Grounds ITAT Quashes Reassessment: Approval from PCIT Instead of PCCIT Renders Section 148 Notice Invalid View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930