Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Trident Group Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Trident Group Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Chandigarh) ₹1.02 Cr Disallowance u/s 14A Upheld: Large Investment Portfolio Cannot Be Managed at ‘Zero Cost’, Holds ITAT Chandigarh The Chandigarh Bench “B” of the ITAT dismissed the appeal of M/s Trident Group Limited for AY 2017-18 and upheld disallowance of ₹1,02,44,219 u/s 14A r/w Rule 8D. The assessee had earned substantial exempt dividend income of ₹22.42 crore from an investment portfolio exceeding ₹124 crore and claimed that no expenditure, except ₹5,774 towards demat charges, was incurred to earn such income, asserting that invest...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031