Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Marksans Pharma Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1717/Mum./2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/08/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Marksans Pharma Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that the benefit under section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act is also available in respect of expenditure on clinical trials outside the approved in-house R&D facility.

Facts- The assessee is a company and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading drugs and pharmaceutical formulations, chemicals, and solvents. The return filed by the assessee was selected for scrutiny and statutory notices u/s. 143(2) as well as Section 142(1) of the Act were issued and served on the assessee.

In its return, the assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s. 35(2AB) of the Act of Rs 40,27,49,180 being 200% of revenue expenditure incurred on scientific research amounting to Rs. 19,75,62,590 and 200% of capital expenditure incurred on scientific research amounting to Rs. 38,12,000.

The assessee could not furnish a copy of Form No. 3CL being the report to be submitted by the prescribed authority to the Director-General of Income Tax (Exemptions) under section 35(2AB) of the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031