Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sapna Nainesh Jatania Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sapna Nainesh Jatania Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot) Reopening Quashed: Reasons Show Only Verification & Borrowed Satisfaction- Wrong Facts, No Enquiry: Tribunal Strikes Down Verification-Based Reopening Assessee’s appeals for AYs 2011-12 & 2012-13 involved additions of Rs.8,60,444 treating penny-stock sale proceeds of Gemstone Investment Ltd as unexplained u/s 69 pursuant to reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144. CIT(A)/NFAC had remanded the case to AO without deciding Assessee’s jurisdictional ground against reopening. Tribunal first condoned 55-day delay after finding the affidavit explanation r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031