Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri A. Kodanda Rami Reddy Vs The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009- 10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Issue – Assessee in this appeal had sold a residential house at Film Nagar, Hyderabad, during the relevant previous year, for a sum of Rs. 6,50,00,000/-. After deducting indexed cost of acquisition, the long term capital gain came to Rs. 5,98,25,430/-. In the tax return filed, assessee claimed exemption under Section 54 of Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) on such capital gain for acq

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. N. Ravindranath says:

    Basing on the present law, the decision given by the court is a decent one. The courts are already very liberal in allowing the multiple investment in the same building. It would be stretching too far to demand for deduction in two disparately placed properties.

    It is high time the act is amended suitably, when the intention is to promote housing in this country, and put an end to this type of litigation wasting the courts’ time for more than 20 years.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31